I don't think it's a case of sharing time; it's a case of time being left, and I'm on the list. So if you don't mind, I'll approach it that way, but I don't think I will take four minutes.
I'm not entirely sure it was clear when Mr. Warawa spoke that this provision does not protect the rights of aboriginals acquired through non-constitutionally arranged items or arrangements with first nations. This bill applies to decisions of government departments--so to any decisions of the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs relating to both reserve lands and first nations individuals. It applies to decisions related to reserve lands, and therefore could apply to decisions of first nations relating to reserve lands under the First Nations Land Management Act, self-governing agreements, or other arrangements.
I want it to be crystal clear, for those who are listening at home at least, that this clause 4 does not protect the rights of aboriginals who are coming out of voluntary agreements or actions by the federal government. It's only those that are the result of a constitutional guarantee.
I might also say, for what it's worth, that technically you don't need clause 4 to protect rights that are constitutionally guaranteed to aboriginals. Although I know it's a common provision in federal statutes, it really isn't necessary. It is not necessary to do the job it tries to do, and it's not adequate to provide complete protection to aboriginals.
Thank you.