I have to agree with Monsieur Bigras that you have to speak specifically to the subamendment: it's members versus recognized political parties. You cannot start talking about clauses that haven't been tabled yet or that we haven't discussed yet at committee. You cannot get ahead of yourself and guess what the outcome of those debates are going to be. You have to stick specifically to the subamendment.
On December 6th, 2010. See this statement in context.