That's exactly what we're doing.
So we're quite excited about this. It's outside the scope of the audit. It would really change the findings of the commissioner, if it were inside the scope of the audit, because it's very much scientifically valid—and it's extremely cost-effective.
You can certainly miss things if you're going to measure water. Even if you measure water once a month for a year, you can miss a slug of a pollutant or something that goes through the system. But the philosophy is that the benthic invertebrates live there, and if they're being affected, we will measure that in the community changes.