I just don't understand how this changes anything that already exists in this bill. This right of every citizen to take issue with another citizen's actions that could be deemed to be harmful to the environment is what we've been debating all along. This is one of the issues the government members have a problem with and they have been saying so all along. I don't understand what this really changes. As Mr. Kennedy said, I thought it was more of a symbolic addition that he could live with having placed in the preamble. I don't understand why Mr. Calkins is raising this bogeyman when in fact that is one of the objections they've had with the bill all along, even before this amendment was introduced.
Maybe somebody could explain that to me.