Thank you. So I'm not speaking to the point of order interruption.
What we're proposing should be removed is “Every resident of Canada has an interest in environmental protection”, which has not been defined, and that's the very point that I'm trying to make. And without a definition of “environmental protection”, if we do not have that clear, then it's not relevant. It's a feel-good, meaningless statement.
So removing that and beginning with “The Government of Canada shall not” is, I think, more appropriate, and therefore we have the motion to remove that editorial, meaningless comment.