It's an intention to clarify in the statute that this is not a defence that can be raised in the case of litigation. That doesn't prevent the defendant from coming forward and saying he has received an approval and has been duly diligent in complying with those provisions and so forth, right? It doesn't stop that. It simply says it's not an absolute bar to an action being brought that certain approvals have been issued.
On February 1st, 2011. See this statement in context.