I acknowledge Ms. Duncan's statement, but we're going to have to disagree on several aspects of it.
Would it be possible for a single person or entity to make several challenges for an investigation under different acts--for example, the Species at Risk Act, and the Environmental Bill of Rights? Could we see individuals or entities making several redundant challenges over and over again in an attempt to slow down the process?
The redundancy of this bill is something we see in several clauses throughout the bill itself, and I am concerned whether there is protection against frivolous or mischief-making provisions in it. I'm concerned that a single person could constantly try to slow down a process by making application after application under different provisions in different acts.