No. But I'd simply like to make a small comment, in response to Mr. Woodworth. I have read and reread the memo that we were sent by the Conseil patronal en environnement du Québec about Bill C-469. In fact, some clauses of the bill, including clauses 16, 22 and 23, bother that organization a little, but I see nothing in the brief that the organization presented to us that indicates a problem with the clause that we are currently looking at.
When Mr. Woodworth claims that this clause is so important that Quebeckers would tear their hair out, I don't know what he's referring to. I'm also trying to find mention of clause 20 in the speaking notes of the witness from the Canadian Hydropower Association. Of course, they mention clauses 16, 19 and 23, but there's nothing in clause 20.
We would support the clause that was presented to us.