I did. My apologies for interrupting.
I have a question on procedure, and this may be a question for the legislative clerk. We have now an amended clause 26, removing the words “Auditor General” and inserting “Commissioner”.
The House ruled that it did not require a royal recommendation because the Auditor General's office had the discretion. Now, with those amendments, it's now with the office of the commissioner, no longer the Auditor General. Could that trigger a royal recommendation? That's a question to you and the clerk.
Procedurally, once the deputy speaker has ruled on this, you can't bring it back in the House. But could that question come from this committee with the changes? This bill should, I hope, die in this committee, but if it's carried forward, could this committee request a review of the royal recommendation question?