Exactly, so if you do it this way, through the legislation, you're going to affirm immediately that yes, this is part of Canadian law, and for parliamentarians this will allow you to define precisely what you want the content and meaning of this doctrine to be. If you leave that up to the courts, then you may have to react to that later if you wanted to change that. There are those two separate ways, each with their own project lines.
On February 10th, 2011. See this statement in context.