Yes, okay.
My question to Mr. Woodworth is in relation to his statement that the bill somehow encumbers hydroelectric projects or projects that involve the development of provincial natural resources. And I can see his point. But how would he then view the Fisheries Act, with its prohibitions against polluting or damaging waterways, thereby placing some restrictions on provincial natural resource projects? I just don't understand how he's fine or seems to be fine with the Fisheries Act but not with this act when it comes to impacts on provincial natural resource projects. Should I read into this that he thinks the Fisheries Act should be repealed?