I do apologize. I recognize I have interjected, but I just wanted to say that the issue is that the federal government's ability to determine remedial measures will now be impaired and subject to the decisions of the courts in a way that will not allow the same degree of consensus to develop that federal-provincial negotiations now permit. In court we operate under what's sometimes referred to as the “king of the hill” theory, whereby somebody wins and somebody loses. It's an entirely different process in federal-provincial negotiations.
On February 15th, 2011. See this statement in context.