I want to understand this. The way this would work out, at least in my view, is that if we remove paragraph 2(i), under “federal work or undertaking”, we are no longer extending the jurisdiction of this act to works outside the exclusive legislative authority of the legislatures. In other words, we are no longer extending the jurisdiction of this act to areas that are concurrent. The paragraph in question simply means that if something is exclusively provincial, it would not fall under the jurisdiction of this act. If we remove this paragraph, then we are restricting the scope of the act, not simply in non-provincial jurisdictions, but also in concurrent areas of jurisdiction. That seemed to me to be substantive. Not only that, it seemed to me to be, in effect, outside the scope of the act, which clearly was intended to apply to any areas of exclusive federal or concurrent federal jurisdiction. Now we're going to change that.
