Thank you.
I have a really quick question for Gilles.
Gilles, I'm concerned at directions I've seen lately. Environment Canada, Parks Canada, did a survey about how people would tolerate improved partnerships within national parks. I was concerned that it was code for more human activities and less protection in national parks.
I have a specific example that you may be able to update me on, and that is the Marmot Basin in Jasper, just as an example. The ski development there would like to take some parkland and do a swap for other land that's at best equal and at worst not as good. Do you know what point that idea has reached? Has that been quashed? Is this still at risk?
The reason I'm asking is that it's important in its own right, but it's also indicative of whether we are going to hold to the guidelines, which say that any swaps have to result in significant improvement in the status of endangered species.