Here, I'm afraid, we're getting on thin ice for officials. I think we're trying to outline for you some thematic concepts that you may want to consider. Whether that translates into specific implementation directions that we take, or indeed into some legislative reforms, those are decisions that the committee needs to take rather than us.
We have tried to suggest that we're trying to go in a certain direction where we adhere to the legal requirements but provide the folks implementing the act with the ability to work with partners, and focus on priorities, and focus on actions that will make the most difference for perhaps the ecosystem or a collection of species, as opposed to a slavish focus on each individual species regardless of its priority, regardless of its ecological priority.
How far we take that, whether that's the right direction, whether we can do that through implementation, whether law reform is needed--those are the critical issues that this committee is wrestling with, I think, and where we need your advice.