I would be happy to comment. I think a number of things have been a challenge.
I guess I would point to how we developed recovery strategies, a big body of the work. Initially a lot of the work was deciding the process around whether to list or not. Then the next big body of work is around recovery strategies.
We've had varying success with that. It is partly that as you identify threats to species, to critical habitat, and identify potential strategies, you need stakeholders and other jurisdictions, environmental groups, conservation groups, and industry at the table. It's a balance between whether you want to move these things quickly or whether you want to be as inclusive as we often feel we need to be able to be.
I think we're still working on that. Then there's the matter of consistency. If there's supposed to be some consistency that comes out of these recovery strategies, you need some processes to be able to do that.
I would also add that as Virginia said, those policies are now available for comment and have been on the website for quite a while, but we've also been providing guidance internally for permitting guidelines and those types of things. So piece by piece we are putting those definitions, policies, and guidelines in place both for ourselves and for stakeholders.