That was one of the issues. We heard a lot of really excellent testimony, and in some cases people were frustrated that they hadn't been heard, or that people were being heard over and over, and no action. I would welcome any advice you would provide after the court cases, after working on better specific policy framework, and so forth.
I notice you read into the record exactly the same quote that was put in by Mrs. Cynthia Wright to the effect that the purpose of SARA is to take timely action to protect species, and yet exactly the opposite seems to be occurring. So our struggle is to try to figure out what best advice we can provide to the Government of Canada to break through this logjam. And it's still as clear as mud exactly where the barrier is. It's looking to me as if a lot of it is federal-provincial relationships, and of course in the case of the species we're dealing with in Alberta—the woodland caribou and the sage grouse—it's conventional oil and gas, and it's oil sands. That comes back to socio-economics.
I guess the obvious question is, do you think there will be greater movement for more openness on scientific reviews and in trying to encourage provincial jurisdictions to be making that information available, so there can be a level of confidence and transparency in exactly what criteria are being considered in making these decisions?