Thank you for your question.
I would probably use the sage grouse example that the government faced with respect to the decision from the Federal Court. When we produced the first draft recovery strategy for sage grouse, we learned from the input of the scientific community, but we also learned from the interpretation of the act. The decision from the Federal Court placed in front of us some clarity with respect to that interpretation.
Since the court decision, Parks Canada replaced the critical habitat section for this particular species, back in October 2009. Now the critical habitat for the sage grouse is protected under SARA, section 58.2, within Grasslands National Park, where approximately 50% of the Canadian population of sage grouse reside. And we'll continue to use our scientific research to determine how best to help this species recover and to continue the implementation of this recovery strategy.