I certainly appreciate that comment, Mr. Moffet, and I agree with it 100%. Management is very important, but I don't think management is something that's emphasized under the act. I think it can be safely said that for species like sage grouse, woodland caribou, and burrowing owl, habitat is quite abundant. So there are other factors. I know we can quibble about that, and whether the vast rangelands and grasslands of Alberta and Saskatchewan are all managed correctly is open to discussion.
Suffice it to say, Ms. Poter, you talked about woodland caribou being in over one-third of the country. I think the expert opinion regarding woodland caribou is that there is a predator-and-prey imbalance. If you're going to do something about recovering endangered species, I would strongly recommend that you actually do those things that recover endangered species.
I'm very concerned as well about SARA's perceived effect on property rights. I represent an agricultural constituency and a forestry constituency in which land is mostly privately owned. Do you take into account whether a piece of land you've deemed to be critical habitat is either privately owned or publicly owned, and do you see different strategies for private land versus public land?