I have two other questions I want to ask.
In your testimony and in response to some of the committee members' questions, you mentioned the direction we've had from the courts. There have been at least three or four decisions in the last few years that impact not only the.... We're talking around the table here about social and economic conditions versus protection of critical habitat, from a scientific basis. It's my understanding that the direction from the courts has been that habitat trumps social and economic conditions. So I want to get feedback on that, on how the two departments are viewing those decisions and the direction we're receiving from the federal courts.
The second point is with regard to a decision that was made about the habitat of the orca and the conflict that has risen between the Fisheries Act and SARA itself. How has that changed the focus of how you deal with habitat, especially when it comes to species in the water?