I agree there are not a lot of bilateral agreements under the Species At Risk Act, as was envisioned, but we now have four, and the last time we were in front of this committee there were only three. Recently one with Ontario was signed.
The barrier really is about getting through the process. Every time one group or another group decides to change language, it requires yet another legal review, so you can appreciate that you get to a place where you're dotting the i's and crossing the t's. I think Pareto's rule always applies: that last 20% of achieving perfection can take 80% of the time. That's where we are, and we anticipate being able to see the Alberta agreement come to fruition shortly.