Thank you.
If you do not mind, I will answer in English.
As you know, within the act there are 28 departments that are required to prepare strategies. However, at least in our informal count, there are 10 departments that are contained within the discussion paper, meaning there are 18—you've mentioned Finance Canada, and there's also Industry Canada, Justice Canada, Heritage Canada, CIDA, and others—that are not. Those departments have to fulfill or comply with the act. Do they have to comply with the act in the context of the four priorities that are identified in the strategy, and what does that mean more generally?
I think the second part of your question is something that we've given a lot of thought to; that is, the question of integration. As you know, Parliament, particularly in section 5, underscored the importance of integration, and the integration of the three pillars of sustainable development. But also in this act, section 3 focuses not on the context of integrating the three pillars but on environmental decision-making.
This is for us an important change—I'm not commenting whether it's good or bad, but it's an important change—from the traditional understanding of the three pillars of sustainable development, as well as what's in my legal mandate under Parliament from the OAG 1995 amendment, which is to integrate economic, social, and environmental issues.