I'm glad you raised that and flagged it, but I'm sure that everybody around this table would agree that what we should look at doing here is to pursue and adopt the best science. That's what we're talking about here: science-based decision-making or evidence-based decision-making.
However, that leads to the next question I want to put to Mr. de Vries, and perhaps to anybody else who wants to comment on this. That has to do with the really difficult interface between evidence- or science-based decision-making, which really ought to dominate what we're talking about here, and socio-economic interests.
Mr. de Vries, you flagged the need for a major re-examination of what this means. You're on the front lines, you're in the money business, and you represent an industrial sector.
So do you, Ms. Gelfand and Mr. McGuinness, in large part.
At that interface between the two, where are the big problems? What are the top two or three problems this report should flag and try to address?