First of all, we didn't request that change. There was a workshop established at the University of Ottawa between the marine fish scientists COSEWIC subcommittee and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. They had two days of bantering back and forth and that's one of the recommendations they came up with. Because they did agree, if you will, that aquatic species were somewhat different. So really, they in fact now are using that as an operating model in the COSEWIC subcommittee for fisheries. For something to be threatened, you must have a 70% decline, and to be endangered, it's something like a 90% decline. They've adopted that.
We're saying that's a modification, but it still doesn't get to the heart of the issue. We want a model that fishery scientists are using around the world to attest to what is the current status of that stock based against a precautionary point reference point. If it's below the precautionary point, that stock is in bad shape. If it's considerably below that point, then it's probably endangered or threatened.