It seems to me that when you get to the level of a strategic review, which is really some sort of policy-wide or region-wide assessment of something well beyond a project level, you're then beyond proponents. It's a proponent who proposes a project.
Keep in mind that in our system of environmental assessment where there are project reviews, it's done on a cost-recovery basis. A proponent pays, if I'm correct, two-thirds or 70% of the cost of a review, which I think is fair game for the project review, but once you get to the level of a strategic review, a region-wide thing that is much less defined, why proponents would want to pay for something they're not responsible for and for which they will not derive benefit, I can't imagine.
So who does that leave? I guess it leaves government, unless maybe it was an industry-wide thing. There's a government responsibility in the same way that governments pay for royal commissions or public inquiries.