Thank you for that question.
In reality, we see really little environmental value added by multiple jurisdictions working on an assessment and time being spent on sorting out who should be doing the assessment, who has administration, and harmonizing different processes. To us, and to me personally, it doesn't really add a whole lot of value to environmental protection.
It's this that we're getting at: there's a lot of administration of environmental assessment, and those resources could be redirected in the ways that we suggested, towards perhaps focusing on key questions around technical matters, as Dr. Usher pointed out, around the science of environmental assessment, instead of the administration of process without achieving any positive outcome as a result of the efforts in harmonization, if you will.