My short answer is this. I would just like to be really clear. Our view is that more regulation is not necessarily better regulation, but a foundation of all of this has to be environmental performance. Nobody's disputing that.
I would come back to two things. One thing is the equivalent substitution piece as an opportunity. And the second thing is timelines and clarity of process, including aboriginal consultation, because we all want to do that well. I think those are two key opportunities to improve the overall process. I think if this committee could make some inroads on those, we would all be well served.