It was a question of the public and organizations that aren't monitoring the legislative process like we are even knowing that this is happening and being able to prepare themselves or participate. In previous similar processes the agency or other government bodies had been in the public saying, “Okay, we're going to review the Environmental Assessment Act or create an environmental assessment act out of the review process guidelines order”—what is important, and so on.
From looking at what has been brought forward so far, it seems that a range of issues are being put before you. Some are specific and technical. Some are fundamental to the way the act is structured and the way environmental assessment would be undertaken. Outside of a fairly small circle of public interest groups we're involved with, there's not much knowledge of this process. Within this process we don't really know what's being discussed.
So with all due respect, if there's an absence of specific legislative language in my proposals, it's because I don't know whether that's what you're looking for or whether you're looking for a structural assessment of how the thing works before writing the actual language.