At least you agree on recommendations to improve the act. That is the most important thing for me.
A review of the regulations was also recommended. In response, the department affirmed "the importance of regulations being written in a way that facilitates enforcement". In my riding of Drummond, there is a serious problem with shale gas exploration. The Canadian Environmental Protection Act applies, but this is part of the exclusion list.
I know you also reviewed the petitions received by the department in this regard. Was this part of your study, or should this be included in a possible study of the confusion created by the exclusion list? Because there is disagreement. For example, people are wondering whether chemicals used in shale gas exploration should be disclosed.