Thank you very much for that question. It's a fantastic question, and it leads into something that I think is a very important part of this plan, which is interjurisdictional coordination, because when you're looking at wetland protection, depending on the impact and the location, we're often dealing with different levels of government. Specifically, when we look at what the major threats to wetlands are throughout Canada, a lot of it is urban and rural development, and so it's often about engaging local and regional governments.
We have a couple of examples of programs in Ontario and also in British Columbia—that's the one I'm most familiar with—which essentially provided a tool kit to local governments to try to, within the regulatory and planning provisions that exist, figure out a way to direct development away from the most sensitive areas. It isn't about no development, but it is about reimagining how development can happen in the context of wetland protection. That needs to happen at a local government level.
So my concluding message would be that I feel that to address situations like the one you've brought up, it's important that this plan takes into consideration the interconnectiveness of jurisdiction.