I guess the other tendency we have, when we talk about these plans—this is what happens when we start talking about percentages of areas, etc.—is that we right away equate size with actually having accomplished something. The bigger it is, the better we've done, so to speak.
Both of you have kind of indicated—and I'll leave this to both of you to maybe answer—that size isn't the biggest issue. I would even argue, from some of the discussions we've had with some of the other witnesses who've been here, that it's bringing the knowledge to the urban community, so to speak, or being able to bring the urban community to that conservation area.
Do you have any ideas and thoughts on how we could integrate those two things together? I think the need for young people in urban centres to have a better understanding of conservation is very critical to this actually succeeding.
Maybe both of you could touch on it, just quickly.