Absolutely. I know I've looked to the Red River Basin Commission, which is an international body including the northern U.S. and southern Canadian regions that are affected by the Red River. They have had several projects of deliberate water storage, not just wetland restoration, but actual tracts of land that have been set aside for storing water. Their goal, through this program, is to offer reduced flows of water in the rivers at peak flood periods without creating downstream effects. So this creates a passive water storage system that will automatically be in play whenever there's excessive runoff, but also gives farmers in the area protection during an excessive moisture event in the growing season. That program...it's not a dike, it's not sandbags, and it's not a diversion channel. It's actually going to store water. The landowners, of course, are compensated for that, and this has to be part of the program.
They have found in the three big projects they've done so far that this is the most economical type of flood mitigation. And we think, with the tremendous challenges last year brought to Manitoba and Saskatchewan, we need to start looking at and talking about these things more in Canada as well.