No. I think we've heard adequate debate. I'm going to make a ruling so that we can move on.
The motion was to invite COSIA here, and I'll read it out:
It was agreed, — That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee hear from Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance, to discuss the anticipated positive environmental outcomes of their mandate at their earliest convenience.
I'm going to rule in favour of Ms. Rempel's point of order. I would ask you, Ms. Duncan, to focus on the reason why they've been invited. You were questioning on more generally the cuts to the environment and how that would possibly impact their research. Let's focus, then, on the reason why they've been called before this committee, and that's the positive outcomes on what they're doing.
Thank you.