First of all, the decision to repeal the act was a policy decision, and it wouldn't be for me to comment on.
What I would say is that under the Auditor General Act, our office has the mandate and responsibility to audit programs of significant interest to parliamentarians. So there was nothing that would constrain us from looking at future work related to climate change, in terms of progress.
Indeed, the 2020 chapter is not within the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act, nor are the contaminated sites. We will continue in the future to look at this as one of the important areas of our work and responsibility.