That's an excellent question. If I could air the dirty laundry of the Wildlife Conservation Society a bit, this is something we struggle with all the time. Do we take the global approach, or do we pick a handful of species and focus on those species? This is something we struggle with.
I think this is why we've put a lot of thought into the three-pillar strategy we put forward today. One is looking at that matrix of landscapes outside of protected areas and developing land-use planning processes that allow us to protect habitat on a broader scale in addressing cumulative impacts from the things we do to landscapes. As well, it's marrying that with a protected area strategy that is complete and is representative of Canada's ecosystems. Then the third pillar is to focus on particular species of concern.
I think conservation is a crisis discipline. You're always trying to save the last of the last. Until we see more significant investment in conservation, that's always going to have to be how it's going to be. We really look at the most critically endangered species in the context of already having developed land-use planning outside and inside parks.