I would like to go back to these two aspects you mentioned.
I'm now asking question 5: what should the NCP implementation priorities be? Of course, we're talking about amending the Fisheries Act that aims to protect fish habitat. You said that it was important to protect the fish habitat because it is what makes it possible to have an effect on all the others.
With respect to environmental assessments, I recall that during the hearings, several individuals emphasized the cumulative effects. Unfortunately, this aspect is ignored in Bill C-38. But these two pieces of legislation are very important for putting in place a national conservation plan. The Fisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act will have to be reviewed.
My question is for you, Mr. Joly and Ms. Clogg. Briefly, what recommendations do you have?