I'm inclined to agree with you, but I hope everyone understands that in a real world of constraints, if we were to increase technical support to conservation delivery, which personally I wouldn't mind doing, other things might need to decrease.
We have great pressure on us at the moment to put money into clean energy and greenhouse gas reductions, which are of course entirely unrelated to technical support for conservation. I'm getting the yank, so do you have a quick response to that?