I do, thank you. In fact I would refer to three areas, perhaps not all of them on your list.
First of all, I think for a conservation plan to be successful it has to be multidisciplinary. It has to take into account not just science, whether it be basic science or applied science, but I think it has to include socio-economic factors. I think it has to include ecological knowledge, aboriginal traditional knowledge, and so forth. I think it has to be broadly informed.
I also think we need to apply a risk-based approach. It's very difficult, given the realities of resources and expertise and so forth, to do it all. I think we have to focus on priorities, and we have to decide what those priorities are. We have to be clear and transparent about that process.
Finally, we have to take a holisitic approach. I think others have referred to this previously, an ecosystem approach that describes clear goals and objectives. This is particularly important to allow us to assess how well we're doing down the road and to ensure Canadians understand how progress is occurring and whether or not we're actually achieving our conservation objectives.