Aspects of our ecologically significant natural lands strategy and policy have been incredibly valuable in looking at nature and trying to assess which are the highest-quality areas, which are the ones most in need of being preserved, and trying to plan in relation to that so that those areas aren't being destroyed.
The tree removal guideline for the city is separate from that plan. I think the two of them would work well together if an area does have to be destroyed. We can put a real value on it so that we don't actually lose that habitat integrity within the urban environment.