Sure. In fact, I think one of the considerations—and maybe you can let me know if you agree—is to base the habitat conservation banking in real property value rather than some very subjective evaluations of projects and their value.
I've done a bit of research on it. In the U.S., in Australia, and in a number of countries in Europe, the concept has evolved much more than it has in Canada. It's based in real property, and real land values are considered. Do you think this is something that we could explore to the benefit of urban conservation here in Canada?