Let me lead off on that. My own view is that when we back up and look at the regulatory reform objectives here, I think that at the core level it is not correct to paint our objectives as polarized. Everybody wants to see effective environmental protection for Canadians, appropriate, responsible development where it's appropriate and responsible, and a clear outcome-oriented focus on conditions should a project be chosen to proceed, through both good EA planning input as well as appropriate regulation.
Our views on these particular amendments that are the subject of today's session are that they are largely very minor inconsequential cleanup amendments. The overall regulatory framework will do an excellent job for Canada to ensure good environmental decision-making, particularly, in our view, on the pipeline pieces, which are well handled at both the federal and provincial levels, from EA right through to the end of use of those facilities.
Elizabeth, do you have anything to add from a legal perspective?