I'm not sure if the information I provide will satisfy your question, but in fact the $14 billion that I referenced and that we referenced at the time of the announcement of Canada's legal withdrawal from the Kyoto accord, was the budgetary number.
It's a number that's based on carbon pricing and international markets. The precise number is far less important than our government's decision not to send billions of hard-earned Canadian tax dollars abroad to buy hot air credits from depressed eastern European economies.
That was the reason our government announced, from the day that we first assumed office until we gave notice after the Durban conference last year, that the Government of Canada regarded the Kyoto protocol as ineffective and unfair, particularly in the context of Canada's circumstances.
With regard to the cost of implementing sector-by-sector greenhouse gas reductions to meet our Copenhagen 2020 targets, those costs are borne on the basis of polluter pays. The sectors pay. We've done it in a very non-prescriptive manner, unlike some other countries that use the regulatory tool. We've done this, for example, in the case of vehicle tailpipe emissions. We've done it in alignment with the United States and with our integrated auto industries. With regard to coal-fired electricity generation, we have done it with....