CEAA already deals with cumulative environmental impacts. So I think there is a mechanism for that to be dealt with in the federal process, and it's increasingly being adopted in provincial processes. You have to remember that the environmental assessment process in Canada, the first legislation for which was in Ontario in 1975, has always been proponent-driven, and I'm in favour of keeping it that way. In other words, the proponents....
You used the phrase “reactive”. I say it's proponent-driven, so I would prefer that it maintain that focus on proponents coming forward and, then, proper decisions being made. That's the point of the EA process: that you take into account all the appropriate factors that you should take into account. Whatever you want to include—cumulative environmental impacts, climate change, whatever Canadians want—should be in that process, but I come back to the concept of efficiency that is my major concern.