If I understand correctly, in this area, we are still consulting and not acting. We are still behind.
I will now go to another question.
Let's talk about the national wildlife areas whose funding was reduced. You say there are targets for cuts. On the other hand, you say that other parks are being created. I find that a bit inconsistent. Other parks are being created, but at the same time there are cuts to national reserves and certain parks. The Lac Saint-François National Wildlife Area, for example, is home to over 200 plant and animal species, some of which are not found elsewhere in Quebec.
How can you explain the fact that there are such drastic 60% reductions when other parks are being created elsewhere? Don't you try to conserve before creating something else?