I was going to integrate it more and use the North American waterfowl management plan as an example, because that human dimension is at its heart. That plan, incidentally, was updated last year to address the hugely important human dimension part of conservation. How does that human dimension get translated on the landscape? Again, it's working with landowners and coming to some of those practical techniques.
If you want more waterfowl, there's something called dense nesting cover. If predators are taking the eggs of those ground-nesting birds, then you don't get the outcomes. The plan would increase dense nesting cover to protect waterfowl from predation. I already mentioned rotational grazing; that's working positively and constructively with the landowner to maintain the economic outcome while achieving conservation outcomes.
Zero-tillage grazing was initiated by the North American waterfowl management plan and others; it's a key tool. There's something called a flushing bar if a farmer is haying. That's a bar that you put in front of the machine that's cutting the hay that scares any wildlife, not just birds, but fawns, and so on, so there are a number of tools, all of which are developed and used cooperatively with the landowner.