I'd like to take a shot at that.
At a social-psychological level here in Canada there's an air of fear that somehow we won't maintain our economic wealth, prosperity, and activity in the country if we protect too much land, in that it will reduce the opportunity for industry to move across the landscape as it needs to. It's a false fear because as we have heard many times—and it's in much of the literature—we have the ability to find the balance between development, conservation, and maintaining the environmental quality of our air and water. Remarkably, we continue not to do that, which I believe is out of that need to try to maintain maximum economic opportunity in the short term. Unless that lens changes and we really accept that we can be okay and can invest in a longer-term future with longer-term strategies, then we'll continue to lose this habitat in the face of that short-term economic priority. It's really about putting more emphasis on the long-term benefits of that habitat conservation. That needs to be profiled and sold more to the public, to industry, and across the country.