No, I think one of the key elements is engaging the broad suite of people who need to be involved in the realization of those conservation goals, including provincial governments, non-governmental organizations of many different stripes and different interests, and in some cases municipal and regional district governments as well. On the convening power and function of the federal government, that's where I agree with Stephen that a little money can go a long way.
A strategy that is hanging off a vision, a publicly stated vision and commitment to meet those targets, can go a long way. Then it's about having the federal government finance and engage their agencies in convening those broad groups of people who will, in the end, be needed to realize it. First nations, provincial governments, and federal governments often have to agree in a trilateral way to protect a certain area. When the dialogue isn't there, when there is no vision and no objective and the dialogue doesn't happen, we're stalled. That's where it is right now. We are stalled in so many places when there's creative energy, good science, good will, and good information on the table about what needs to be done. It's just not moving, so I think the federal government needs to take that leadership role, paint the vision, invest in convening those dialogues, and commit to the broad stakeholder engagement that will realize those lasting outcomes. Without that—and I've been working on the marine environment similarly, or on freshwater conservation issues where we have lost that convening opportunity—it really halts progress.