I'd be happy to address that question. Thank you very much.
The overarching frame, I think, is that we need to look at the natural habitat classifications we have across the country and make sure that we protect very significant components of those habitats. We know that climate change and the shift of climate regimes across habitat are going to change the composition of those areas and the species mix that perhaps use it. The base of habitat is the vegetation complex, the soil complexes, in these areas, and different species will use them over time. We have to accommodate the shift of species regimes across the landscape, and that is best done by maintaining that diversity of habitat.
As Bob Sopuck said, you can transition a habitat and it will serve some other function, but only to the degree that you have adjacent habitats that species can move to and accommodate their futures in under a different climate regime. It's really about taking a bolder step in protecting that representation of ecosystem classification types across the country.