Right, but again, if ecosystem function is important, and I'm convinced that it is, we can change land from one state to a second state and still retain ecosystem values.
Just for the record, the amount of boreal forest being affected by the oil sands development in Alberta compared to the amount of boreal forest right across the country is very small.
Again, in terms of the 600 square kilometres that have been affected by oil sands development, I would note that 10% of that has already been rejuvenated to perhaps a different habitat state, but it has been reclaimed, nevertheless.
Mr. Davidson, I was interested in your comments about fisheries and habitat. Again, when one looks at prairie reservoirs, for example, which greatly altered riverine habitats, creating lake habitats from what were river habitats, what happens when that occurs—and it has happened and continues to happen—is that the fish community just booms. So, again, with this notion of moving from one state to a second state, obviously, the creation of dams in prairie Canada has been tremendous for fish, hasn't it?