Okay. I am thinking, for example, of a hydro-electric project on a waterway. It could be the case that it will destroy some fish habitat and that they will replace that elsewhere to compensate, but in doing so will destroy terrestrial habitat. So there would still be a net loss of habitat. Am I interpreting that correctly, or is there a flaw in my thinking?
On April 16th, 2013. See this statement in context.